Editor’s Note: This week, the Justice Department announced “coordinated arrests and charges” to “dismantle Hamas terror finance network” as authorities rolled up three people in the United States for allegedly funneling money to the designated terrorist organization. The law enforcement actions came under the auspices of the “Joint Task Force October 7”, an interagency coordination cell, set up by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify and prosecute cases against the perpetrators of the 2023 attack. However, the task force’s first arrest of an alleged participant in the October 7th attack occurred a few months ago in Louisiana, and a particularly active defense may test how far the task force’s efforts can go. -Seamus

Almost three years after the Hamas-led Oct. 7th attack on Israel, an alleged perpetrator of the attack is set to be tried in a U.S. court for the first time. Mahmoud Amin Ya’qub Al-Muhtadi, the 34-year-old Palestinian defendant, faces federal charges for conduct on that fateful day in Israel and for reportedly lying to gain admission to the United States. 

As the prosecution inches toward a trial date in the Western District of Louisiana, where Al-Muhtadi settled in Lafayette after arriving in the United States from Palestine by way of Egypt, federal officials signal an expanding takedown of alleged Hamas supporters in the U.S. In the past few months, federal authorities have moved to indict or arrest figures in Florida, Louisiana, New York, and California for allegedly supporting Hamas.

There were virtually no Oct. 7th-related arrests previously (though there were charges in absentia). But on Oct. 2, the Justice Department suggested the first wave of arrests in the U.S. was on the horizon, announcing the indictment of one man and the arrests of three others who live in America for allegedly funneling money to Hamas. “Anyone who finances or assists terrorist organizations responsible for the deaths of American citizens should expect to be prosecuted by the Department of Justice,” Attorney General Todd Blanche said alongside a retinue of senior Justice Department officials.

Al-Muhtadi’s case in Louisiana, however, marks a significant hurdle for the Justice Department’s push to prosecute conduct tied to Oct. 7th and a test for how the criminal justice system handles overseas acts of terrorism. Prosecutors’ principal claim is that Al-Muhtadi provided material support to Hamas, contributing to the deaths of Americans and Israelis on Oct. 7th. The bulk of the evidence prosecutors plan to introduce against him comes from Israeli intelligence, intercepted phone calls, clandestine investigations, and battlefield reports—for crimes that all allegedly happened outside the U.S. 

The federal defenders representing Al-Muhtadi argue his case undermines basic due process principles, writing that the government’s evidence relies on the Israeli government’s word and that the “proof that would corroborate [his defense] no longer exists,” lost to the ruins in Gaza. To prosecutors, he’s a terrorist who lived among us.

logo

The Rest of This Story Is Behind a Paywall

Let's explain why. Our Friday morning roundups are always free. However, this story is part of our weekly Sunday Series we call The Rabbit Hole where we choose a single federal court docket, filing, or topic and dive deep into the details. To do the stories in the series properly, we invest significant reporting resources that can only happen with subscriber support.

Upgrade To Read the Rest